Stop Press: The Bath House, Le Cateau Road, Colchester CO2 7NA – Let to Ellisons Solicitors. See our News Page for information on this innovative project.

Community Infrastructure Levy – CIL

Community Infrastructure Levy – CIL

Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) – two recent appeal decisions

Written on 24/04/2018 by Holmes and Hills, Solicitors

We continue to see CIL issues, including draconian measures applied for what a lay person may consider to be inconsequential or innocent breaches. Where CIL is concerned however, the appeal decisions increasingly demonstrate that the law is the law and, unless there is strict compliance, the end result is usually unsuccessful appeals as far as surcharges and CIL penalties are concerned.

This is perhaps as best illustrated by two recent Planning Inspectorate decisions.

In the first the alleged failures were to assume liability for the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and the failure to submit a commencement notice before commencing works on chargeable development. Although the appellant acknowledged that he did fail to assume liability or submit a commencement notice, he alleged that this was because he received poor and confusing communication in telephone conversations with the collecting authority (‘Council’).  In simple terms, it was the Appellant’s case that had he received clear guidance the situation would have been avoided.

The Inspector found that “In the absence of any documentary evidence before me it is not possible to conclude that the appellant was given confusing or incorrect information regarding his CIL responsibilities. I can only consider the appeal on the known facts”. The facts were very much that the Appellant had failed to comply with the statutory requirements, with the Inspector further commenting “it was clear from the correspondence that the appellant was in danger of having to pay surcharges if he did not comply with the requests for submission of the notices. I consider the appellant’s decision to ignore these warnings was a risky strategy to take”.

The appeal was therefore dismissed and the Appellant required to pay the CIL surcharges levied by the Council.

In the second the allegation was that the Council has issued a Demand Notice with an incorrectly determined deemed commencement date. The description of the development in the grant of permission clearly included demolition. The Appellant acknowledged that demolition works had commenced but argued that they were only carried out to enable retaining wall structures to be constructed in relation to the planning permission and did not commence works on the CIL development.

Regulation 7(2) CIL explains that development is to be treated as commencing on the earliest date on which any material operation begins to be carried out on the relevant land. Section 56(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) explains that development shall be taken to be begun on the earliest date on which any material operation comprised in the development begins to be carried out. Section 56(4) TCPA gives examples of what “material operation” means and includes “any work of demolition of a building”.

The result? The appeal was dismissed. The Inspector was satisfied that there has been a deemed commencement and, absent the Appellant submitting a commencement notice, the council could impose a surcharge – which the Appellant was liable to pay.

We have emphasised before the importance of complying with the CIL Regs and being clear about deadlines and when, and which, forms need to be submitted etc. We do recommend that you obtain proof of submitting CIL forms etc. because (as explained at Holmes & Hills’  2017 Planning Law Update seminar series) a Planning Inspector is unlikely to help you out unless you can prove what was sent and when [so use emails or recorded delivery, or deliver in person and get receipts(!)], or what you were told and when [so keep a record of what has been said and by whom] and it is only this documentary evidence that could “save your bacon” at a later date.

That said, following Holmes and Hills’ input one London Borough has agreed that, despite its original position to the contrary, a valid request for abatement (or credit for CIL payments already made under one permission, permission A, towards another, permission B which was to be commenced in place of A moving forwards) was made and which, in practical terms means that the client is not required to pay just short of £30,000 twice over (i.e. once for permission A and once for B).

At Morley Riches & Ablewhite we are able to advise you of the impact of CIL on the viability of your development.  Speak to our expert on this subject, Peter Riches.

Our Services

Clients choose to work with our friendly, professional team time and time again because we consistently deliver a quality service that makes their lives easier. Our plain-speaking approach ensures everyone is kept on the same page and that a project can move forward in a timely and cost-effective way.


Commercial Estate Agency


Property Management


Property Valuation

Landlord and Tenant

Building Surveying

Development Consultancy

What people say about working with us

  • "Morley, Riches & Ablewhite – forgettable name, but seriously unforgettable service! We engaged MRA about 3 years’ ago on recommendation.  We have never regretted it. Good, practical advice on all property aspects, including new leases, professional discussions with existing Landlords and advice generally. At all times the service has been prompt, professional and cost-effective.  Communication skills are first rate and we have confidence in the calibre of MRA’s team and their ability to provide commercial insight and evolve innovative win / win solutions."
    John May, Director, Thompson & Morgan Group Holdings Limited
  • "Morley Riches & Ablewhite have managed two of our multi-let office investments since 2008.  We have always been completely satisfied with their performance and feel comfortable that our tenants are in safe hands.  Rents are always collected promptly and accounted to us accurately.  Service charge accounts are always well maintained and presented to our tenants. We have also instructed Peter Riches to undertake a range of professional work on other properties in our portfolio including valuations, rent reviews, records of condition and schedules of dilapidation.  Again, we have always been pleased with the outcome and as a result have been happy to recommend him to other property owners known to us."
    Graham Holdgate, Moreland Limited
  • "Griffin Chapman has a long-standing relationship with Morley Riches & Ablewhite. Our experience is that they are highly professional, efficient and proactive. We have been pleased to recommend a number of our clients to Morley Riches & Ablewhite for assistance in property matters. The feedback that we have received has been highly positive. We have also been pleased to co-sponsor a number of successful corporate events with Morley Riches & Ablewhite over recent years."
    Griffin Chapman, Chartered Accountants
  • "Being a local business in Colchester, we seek to establish relationships with local professionals in certain key areas of business. Morley Riches and Ablewhite are a professional friend of Handelsbanken and  understood from a very early stage what we were looking for from their reports. They  have been extremely prompt in their delivery  of valuations and more than happy to discuss all aspects of the property market within our catchment area, which we find very valuable.  Overall a pleasure to deal with."
    Russell Felstead, Handelsbanken
  • "We have acted alongside Peter Riches of Morley Riches and Ablewhite for a number of years for a mutual client which is a major national landowner. Peter is sharp and incisive and a pleasure to deal with and we value the expertise and commitment he brings to transactions. We look forward to continuing to work with Morley Riches and Ablewhite in the future."
    Anthony Alderman, Partner of Bond Dickinson LLP
  • "I have worked with Morley Riches and Ablewhite for several years. I have always found them to be trustworthy, professional, responsive and accurate while offering a flexible approach to problem solving. They provide excellent value for money and also deliver additional value through their thorough knowledge and network. Reputation and branding are important to any business so it’s important to select organisations who have a compatible constitution and culture. MRA demonstrate empathy with corporate objectives, they manage customer relationships effectively and efficiently and work seamlessly as part of a team. I would recommend them to anyone who needs a professional property service."
    Steve Heywood, Hills Building Group
Get In Touch

Get in touch

Telephone 01206 505707

If you’ve got a question about the services we deliver, or would like some advice on how we can support your project, simply get in touch and we’d be more than happy to help.

Alternatively complete the form below for a member of our team to get in touch.

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Telephone (required)